Written by Sutherland Institute
June 4, 2018
SALT LAKE CITY — Today, Sutherland Institute’s Bill Duncan, director for The Center for Family and Society, released the following statement responding to the Supreme Court decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission:
“Today’s decision from the Supreme Court in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission emphasizes an important principle of nondiscrimination laws: equal application of the law,” Duncan said. “Combined with past Court decisions upholding the dignity of those in the LGBT community, today’s ruling reminds us that equality applies to all Americans, not just the favored few, and we must protect those with firmly held religious beliefs, members of the LGBTQ community, and all citizens alike.
“Animus undertaken in the name of any cause – religious freedom, LGBT equality, or any other – is and remains discrimination disavowed by American values and political principles.
“With their 7-2 decision, the Court also revealed that a reasonable coalition of both conservatives and liberals can recognize that the state has an interest in preventing discrimination and in preserving the First Amendment rights of people of faith. This principle of inclusion is a good guide for national and state policymakers going forward. Reasonable actors of all stripes ought to see today’s decision as an opportunity to elevate our dialogue, rather than retreating into ideological comfort zones, and seek out legal protections inclusive of everyone – even those with whom we disagree.”
Sutherland Institute will offer further analysis in op-ed form later in the week. To sign up to receive our newsletter with updates, click here.
More Insights
Read More
Conservatives’ Golden Opportunity to Win the Minimum-Wage Argument
Election year offers conservatives an opportunity to deliver a pro-worker message that can win over persuadables on the minimum-wage debate.
Protecting property rights against government overreach
While governments can continue to regulate land use, these regulations and fees must be justified by a government interest and proportional to the effect of the development’s impact on that interest.
Do we need to care about the Utah State Board of Education?
For any Utah voters who also feel like K-12 public education is headed in the wrong direction, learning about the candidates running for a seat on the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) is a wise choice this election season.