
Written by Nic Dunn
May 2, 2024
Originally published in National Review.
California’s new $20-an-hour minimum wage for fast-food workers has again sparked a familiar debate about upward mobility. In an election year, with more voters paying attention than usual, policy debates take on added weight. This offers free-market conservatives a unique opportunity to win over persuadable voters by articulating a compelling vision of opportunity that’s framed in moral, rather than purely economic, language.
While it’s important to recognize that minimum-wage hikes can indeed have unintended consequences, conservatives should emphasize the harmful impact of the hikes on workers, a point articulated well by the American Enterprise Institute’s Beth Akers.
“It’s precisely these most vulnerable workers in our economy who are probably the ones who need the most support and are most likely to lose from these sorts of policies,” Akers said during a recent episode of Sutherland Institute’s Defending Ideas podcast. “If what we care about are the people who are most economically vulnerable. . . . these sorts of policies are actually pushing in the wrong direction.”
Read the full piece at National Review here.
More Insights
Read More
What does healthy masculinity look like? | Andrew Reiner
Today, a lot of boys are receiving mixed signals from our culture about masculinity and how men should behave. But parents and communities can help boys thrive by building stronger relationships and emotional resilience.
The Human-Centered Benefits of AI: Reality vs. Perception
From lifesaving medical research to practical tools that help local businesses operate more efficiently, AI is already producing meaningful, real-world benefits.
Americans fear AI will take jobs – but worry less about their own, new report and survey find
Sutherland Institute will co-host two events Oct. 27-28 focused on civil dialogue, family policy, and the demographic changes affecting Utah.

