They explore the unique role of election administrators, the political pressures they can face, and whether removing party labels could strengthen public confidence in elections.

It deeply distorts what is actually happening. Some of the decisions of the just-concluded court session make this clear.

States must opt into the program for families to receive scholarships. Utah has already opted in. Regardless of what a state decides, individuals from any state can donate to any approved SGOs in another participating state and still receive a tax credit.

They discuss regulatory “dark matter,” the decline of congressional responsibility, practical examples of federal agencies pressuring states, and how federalism, transparency, and a renewed commitment to separation of powers could help rein in Washington’s influence.

Securing Utah, and America, as the land of opportunity for future generations requires thinking in aspirational terms. It’s more than simply “tinkering” with existing programs — it’s transforming a system that is well-intentioned, and has helped many families, but has yet to fully realize the aspirational intent of the war on poverty.