pixel

Policy

Education

Human beings are magnificent. We were born with a God-given ability to learn and the capacity to grow. As Aristotle put it, “All men by nature desire to know.” Education is broader than any one school system. It’s a series of opportunities to learn, which should be delivered in ways that allow us to meet the unique needs of children. The growing diversity of our student population requires an equitable education for every child, which contemplates both productive citizenship and employment and which is delivered by the best teachers – whoever they are.

This vision for education requires humility and the pursuit of good ideas – wherever they come from. We can achieve this by empowering parents to create learning paths as unique as the student, rejecting approaches that undermine decision-making authority of those closest to the student, respecting taxpayers as owners of the public education system, and protecting the marketplace of options and the innovators who contribute to it. Education is necessary because each individual has the potential to accomplish great things. Education should reflect these truths, and we believe it can.

Education

Human beings are magnificent. We were born with a God-given ability to learn and the capacity to grow. As Aristotle put it, “All men by nature desire to know.” Education is broader than any one school system. It’s a series of opportunities to learn, which should be delivered in ways that allow us to meet the unique needs of children. The growing diversity of our student population requires an equitable education for every child, which contemplates both productive citizenship and employment and which is delivered by the best teachers – whoever they are.

This vision for education requires humility and the pursuit of good ideas – wherever they come from. We can achieve this by empowering parents to create learning paths as unique as the student, rejecting approaches that undermine decision-making authority of those closest to the student, respecting taxpayers as owners of the public education system, and protecting the marketplace of options and the innovators who contribute to it. Education is necessary because each individual has the potential to accomplish great things. Education should reflect these truths, and we believe it can.

Conversations

Should parents have a meaningful say in what their children learn — and how they learn it? On this episode of Defending Ideas, we examine two pivotal legal battles shaping the future of parental rights in education: one challenging a state-level school choice program, and another headed to the U.S. Supreme Court that could restrict a parent’s ability to opt their child out of curriculum that conflicts with their religious beliefs.
 
Host Nic Dunn is joined by Bill Duncan, Sutherland’s Constitutional Law and Religious Freedom Fellow, and Christine Cooke Fairbanks, Sutherland’s Education Policy Fellow.
 
They help answer a critical question raised by these cases: How should the public education system accommodate the diverse values of American families? This conversation explores both constitutional principles and common-sense reasoning for prioritizing parental engagement, and why doing so is essential for a pluralistic, self-governing society.
 
Show notes:
In fight between Maryland school district and parental rights, U.S. Supreme Court should protect religious freedom — Deseret News https://sutherlandinstitute.org/in-fight-between-maryland-school-district-and-parental-rights-u-s-supreme-court-should-protect-religious-freedom/
Utah Fits All legal fight demonstrates why we need judicial reform — Sutherland Insights https://sutherlandinstitute.org/utah-fits-all-legal-fight-demonstrates-why-we-need-judicial-reform/
The Mahmoud case and ongoing education policy debates — Sutherland Insights https://sutherlandinstitute.org/the-mahmoud-case-and-ongoing-education-policy-debates/
Religious Contributions to Education: Social Benefits of Religion, Volume 3 — Sutherland Institute https://sutherlandinstitute.org/reports/religious-contributions-to-education/

Should parents have a meaningful say in what their children learn — and how they learn it? On this episode of Defending Ideas, we examine two pivotal legal battles shaping the future of parental rights in education: one challenging a state-level school choice program, and another headed to the U.S. Supreme Court that could restrict a parent’s ability to opt their child out of curriculum that conflicts with their religious beliefs.

Host Nic Dunn is joined by Bill Duncan, Sutherland’s Constitutional Law and Religious Freedom Fellow, and Christine Cooke Fairbanks, Sutherland’s Education Policy Fellow.

They help answer a critical question raised by these cases: How should the public education system accommodate the diverse values of American families? This conversation explores both constitutional principles and common-sense reasoning for prioritizing parental engagement, and why doing so is essential for a pluralistic, self-governing society.

Show notes:
In fight between Maryland school district and parental rights, U.S. Supreme Court should protect religious freedom — Deseret News https://sutherlandinstitute.org/in-fight-between-maryland-school-district-and-parental-rights-u-s-supreme-court-should-protect-religious-freedom/
Utah Fits All legal fight demonstrates why we need judicial reform — Sutherland Insights https://sutherlandinstitute.org/utah-fits-all-legal-fight-demonstrates-why-we-need-judicial-reform/
The Mahmoud case and ongoing education policy debates — Sutherland Insights https://sutherlandinstitute.org/the-mahmoud-case-and-ongoing-education-policy-debates/
Religious Contributions to Education: Social Benefits of Religion, Volume 3 — Sutherland Institute https://sutherlandinstitute.org/reports/religious-contributions-to-education/

YouTube Video UExQb0RWZDJ5SWdBWUdqLTJaazdYbmpxMWpYTTlhWVlDTy4zQzFBN0RGNzNFREFCMjBE

Parental Rights on Trial: What’s at Stake in Education

Should parents have a meaningful say in what their children learn — and how they learn it? On this episode of Defending Ideas, we examine two pivotal legal battles shaping the future of parental rights in education: one challenging a state-level school choice program, and another headed to the U.S. Supreme Court that could restrict a parent’s ability to opt their child out of curriculum that conflicts with their religious beliefs.
 
Host Nic Dunn is joined by Bill Duncan, Sutherland’s Constitutional Law and Religious Freedom Fellow, and Christine Cooke Fairbanks, Sutherland’s Education Policy Fellow.
 
They help answer a critical question raised by these cases: How should the public education system accommodate the diverse values of American families? This conversation explores both constitutional principles and common-sense reasoning for prioritizing parental engagement, and why doing so is essential for a pluralistic, self-governing society.
 
Show notes:
In fight between Maryland school district and parental rights, U.S. Supreme Court should protect religious freedom — Deseret News https://sutherlandinstitute.org/in-fight-between-maryland-school-district-and-parental-rights-u-s-supreme-court-should-protect-religious-freedom/
Utah Fits All legal fight demonstrates why we need judicial reform — Sutherland Insights https://sutherlandinstitute.org/utah-fits-all-legal-fight-demonstrates-why-we-need-judicial-reform/
The Mahmoud case and ongoing education policy debates — Sutherland Insights https://sutherlandinstitute.org/the-mahmoud-case-and-ongoing-education-policy-debates/
Religious Contributions to Education: Social Benefits of Religion, Volume 3 — Sutherland Institute https://sutherlandinstitute.org/reports/religious-contributions-to-education/

Should parents have a meaningful say in what their children learn — and how they learn it? On this episode of Defending Ideas, we examine two pivotal legal battles shaping the future of parental rights in education: one challenging a state-level school choice program, and another headed to the U.S. Supreme Court that could restrict a parent’s ability to opt their child out of curriculum that conflicts with their religious beliefs.

Host Nic Dunn is joined by Bill Duncan, Sutherland’s Constitutional Law and Religious Freedom Fellow, and Christine Cooke Fairbanks, Sutherland’s Education Policy Fellow.

They help answer a critical question raised by these cases: How should the public education system accommodate the diverse values of American families? This conversation explores both constitutional principles and common-sense reasoning for prioritizing parental engagement, and why doing so is essential for a pluralistic, self-governing society.

Show notes:
In fight between Maryland school district and parental rights, U.S. Supreme Court should protect religious freedom — Deseret News https://sutherlandinstitute.org/in-fight-between-maryland-school-district-and-parental-rights-u-s-supreme-court-should-protect-religious-freedom/
Utah Fits All legal fight demonstrates why we need judicial reform — Sutherland Insights https://sutherlandinstitute.org/utah-fits-all-legal-fight-demonstrates-why-we-need-judicial-reform/
The Mahmoud case and ongoing education policy debates — Sutherland Insights https://sutherlandinstitute.org/the-mahmoud-case-and-ongoing-education-policy-debates/
Religious Contributions to Education: Social Benefits of Religion, Volume 3 — Sutherland Institute https://sutherlandinstitute.org/reports/religious-contributions-to-education/

YouTube Video UExQb0RWZDJ5SWdBWUdqLTJaazdYbmpxMWpYTTlhWVlDTy4zQzFBN0RGNzNFREFCMjBE

Parental Rights on Trial: What’s at Stake in Education

Insights & Takeaways

Connect

Get the Newsletter