Written by William C. Duncan
November 20, 2024
Originally published in The Federalist.
In Utah v. United States, the state of Utah is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a lawsuit challenging the federal government’s practice of indefinitely holding on to a large percentage of land in the state without a specific purpose. This deprives the state and its citizens of the ability to manage and benefit from the lands around them. It also undercuts the principle of federalism. The court should accept Utah’s case and give the state a chance to make its argument against this federal overreach.
Overwhelming amounts of land in the Western states are actually owned by the federal government, nearly 70 percent of the state of Utah alone. According to the state, about half of Utah’s federal land is “unappropriated,” meaning the federal government has not designated it for any particular use (like a national park or a military base). This is in contrast to much smaller proportions of federally owned land in the Eastern and Midwestern states.
Read the full article here.
More Insights
Read More
Why parental choice in Utah Fits All Scholarship is real accountability
The program intentionally puts parents in charge of academic accountability, or their child’s outcomes. That’s the right thing to do.
Who runs elections best? A 50-state ranking | Chris McIsaac
Which states have the strongest election policies? And what can they teach us about how elections should really be run? R Street Institute’s Chris McIsaac joins Defending Ideas to discuss a new 50-state election scorecard.
The principles of prayer in public meetings
Even those representatives who do not have a particular religious commitment can recognize the importance of religious exercise to the people of the state and nation and signaling that the government harbors no hostility to that exercise.

