
Written by Sutherland Institute
September 12, 2019
Sutherland Institute applauds the Utah Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the constitutionality of SB 78 – a 2016 law that created partisan elections for members of the Utah State Board of Education.
The court offered a common sense ruling that board members are not employees of the state — acknowledging voters’ understanding that they are electing state leaders, not state employees. Therefore, SB 78 cannot run afoul of the prohibition on partisan tests for employees in the state’s education system.
Reinstating SB 78 is good news for Utah voters and public school students. Partisan elections in board member races is prudent policy because it raises the profile of the 15 elected offices that create important statewide policy on licensing, standards and assessments. Each elected board member represents almost twice as many people as a state senator does. Unfortunately, without efforts to improve the visibility of these races, few people know who their elected board members are – breaking down public participation and government transparency.
Helping Utahns have clear choices at the ballot box creates the opportunity for their voices to be more clearly heard on public education policy decisions.
Education helps students reach their unique potential. The way public education is governed in the state plays a crucial role in making sure this can happen.
More Insights
Read More
Why parent-friendly school district websites deserve more recognition
To further advance parent access to curriculum, Sutherland Institute is launching the Partners in Learning Certificate project.
Republicans should address welfare’s work disincentives in budget reconciliation
Unlocking upward mobility for millions of struggling people who feel trapped on government assistance also requires reevaluating the government-constructed barriers that can disincentivize people from working or pursuing professional advancement.
How to empower local school board members to lead education reform
What if one of the most important policy levers for education reform is much closer to home — yet gets ignored far too often?