Written by Nic Dunn
June 2, 2026
Because families experience the safety net holistically, we need reform efforts that can be holistic as well.
That means we need to ask another question: “If we were designing this system from scratch, with the explicit goal of providing temporary help while aiding families toward work-based independence, what would it look like?”
That seemingly subtle change in our approach to the issue is the difference between slow, incremental revisions, and comprehensive aspirational reform.
We need more of the latter, and fortunately a growing movement of state and national leaders, practitioners, and policymakers is making this more aspirational question not just a hypothetical or academic exercise, but a real opportunity to transform how this nation helps its poor.
Read More
Working paper on history of parent-driven education points toward reforms
Parents and policymakers alike may find the paper useful in understanding education policy, where we are likely headed, and what we should do next.
Will AI kill us in 10 years? | Chris Koopman & Ford Copple
Is AI really on track to destroy humanity, or are we confusing small risks with science fiction? On this episode of Defending Ideas, Nic Dunn sits down with Chris Koopman, CEO of Abundance Institute, and Ford Copple, tech policy analyst at Sutherland Institute, to discuss the growing debate over AI safety, regulation, data centers, and technological innovation.
Massachusetts case raises concerns about government cutting parents out of children’s decisions
When parents pose a threat to children’s safety, the state should act. But ideological disagreements are not a reason to cut parents out of a child’s life.

