Written by Sutherland Institute
September 29, 2025
SALT LAKE CITY (September 29, 2025) – Today, Sutherland Institute released the following statement in response to the events of the weekend, including the passing of Russell M. Nelson, president of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and those killed and injured in a tragic shooting and fire at a Church ward building in Grand Blanc, Michigan:
“Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the world lost a champion for the importance of religious freedom and faith in public life, with the passing of President Nelson. We mourn the loss of a man who devoted his life to building bridges and spreading Christ’s love across the world.
Following the horrific shooting and fire at a Church building in Grand Blanc, Michigan, we also recognize how much society benefits from President Nelson’s life of strength and courage during times like this. We echo his words from a statement he made just a few weeks ago: ‘…we are all children of God, we must treat one another with more dignity, compassion and respect.’
Our prayers are with the Nelson family and the families of those lost and injured in Michigan.”
###
Media Contact:
More Insights
Read More
Working paper on history of parent-driven education points toward reforms
Parents and policymakers alike may find the paper useful in understanding education policy, where we are likely headed, and what we should do next.
Will AI kill us in 10 years? | Chris Koopman & Ford Copple
Is AI really on track to destroy humanity, or are we confusing small risks with science fiction? On this episode of Defending Ideas, Nic Dunn sits down with Chris Koopman, CEO of Abundance Institute, and Ford Copple, tech policy analyst at Sutherland Institute, to discuss the growing debate over AI safety, regulation, data centers, and technological innovation.
Massachusetts case raises concerns about government cutting parents out of children’s decisions
When parents pose a threat to children’s safety, the state should act. But ideological disagreements are not a reason to cut parents out of a child’s life.