Written by William C. Duncan
February 17, 2026
The Washington statutory scheme challenged in this case is inconsistent with the constitutional recognition of parents’ responsibility to direct the upbringing of their children. It interferes with the parent-child relationship of children who are particularly vulnerable and in need of parental direction. It deprives some parents of the custody of their children and undermines the ability of those parents to fulfill their responsibility to protect their children’s health. It specifically extinguishes a prerequisite for parental responsibility, notice of critical information about their child. It does all of this without any finding of parental unfitness, but merely because the parents differ from the State’s preferred position on matters of gender and sexuality.
Read the full PDF version of the report by clicking the button below.
Read More
How Utah Fits All is helping students with special needs and other learning challenges
Education choice programs can change the course of a child’s life, expanding their knowledge and increasing their confidence, especially after a season of struggle with profound challenges. Utah should expand its education choice programs and offerings so more families have these experiences and more children can thrive.
Rethinking Head Start | Assistant Secretary Alex J. Adams
On this episode of Defending Ideas, Nic Dunn speaks with Alex Adams, Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), about his efforts to reduce ineffective federal regulations and give states more room to innovate.
Sutherland Institute announces 2026 Congressional Series
Sutherland Institute announces its 2026 Congressional Series.

