pixel
Sutherland Institute files amicus brief in IPEC v. Ferguson

Written by William C. Duncan

February 17, 2026

The Washington statutory scheme challenged in this case is inconsistent with the constitutional recognition of parents’ responsibility to direct the upbringing of their children. It interferes with the parent-child relationship of children who are particularly vulnerable and in need of parental direction. It deprives some parents of the custody of their children and undermines the ability of those parents to fulfill their responsibility to protect their children’s health. It specifically extinguishes a prerequisite for parental responsibility, notice of critical information about their child. It does all of this without any finding of parental unfitness, but merely because the parents differ from the State’s preferred position on matters of gender and sexuality.

Read the full PDF version of the report by clicking the button below.

Connect with Sutherland Institute

Join Our Donor Network