Written by Sutherland Institute
May 13, 2005
This Court’s standard of review in regulatory takings cases should be applied in eminent domain cases. The reasons that call for heightened scrutiny when a regulatory taking is alleged apply with equal force when the government seeks to condemn private property through its eminent domain powers. While the public purposes that might be served by eminent domain are the same as those that might be served through the general police power, the eminent domain power is limited by the public use requirement of the 5th Amendment. This limitation serves to protect property owners from being singled out, recognizes that fair market value will often not make property owners whole, assures that the fundamental right to exclude will not be violated without a compelling public purpose, and guards against the abuse of public authority and the corruption of our democratic process.
Read the full PDF version of the report by clicking the button below.
Read More
What does healthy masculinity look like? | Andrew Reiner
Today, a lot of boys are receiving mixed signals from our culture about masculinity and how men should behave. But parents and communities can help boys thrive by building stronger relationships and emotional resilience.
The Human-Centered Benefits of AI: Reality vs. Perception
From lifesaving medical research to practical tools that help local businesses operate more efficiently, AI is already producing meaningful, real-world benefits.
Americans fear AI will take jobs – but worry less about their own, new report and survey find
Sutherland Institute will co-host two events Oct. 27-28 focused on civil dialogue, family policy, and the demographic changes affecting Utah.

