Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Stay Connected by Signing up for Sutherland's Newsletter
For Email Newsletters you can trust
Utah Schools at a Glance

The Sutherland Institute’s philosophy is simple: We believe that parents are responsible for their childrens' education and that the state role in education is primarily as a support to parents. We also believe that educational freedom is a necessary ingredient in providing the best education possible for each individual student.

click for more details
English Español
Utah Spending Clock

How Fast is Utah Spending Your Money?

Sutherland Institute

SUTHERLAND URGES LEGISLATURE TO SIMPLIFY NAME-REMOVAL PROCESS FOR CITIZEN PETITIONS

Sutherland Institute has called on the Utah State Legislature to make it easier for citizens to have their names removed from initiative petitions.

Sutherland Institute continues to support meaningful ethics reform.  As detailed in the Institute’s recently-published analysis of the Utahns for Ethical Government (UEG) proposal, however, the “independent ethics commission” and legislative ethics code proposed by UEG is definitely not the way to undertake ethics reform.  It is, in fact, dangerous.

Compounding concerns is the fact that after actually reading the 21-page UEG initiative, many Utahns are finding the process of removing their names from the petition to be much more time-consuming and inconvenient than it was to sign it.  To address this issue, Sutherland Institute is requesting that members of the Senate and House implement legislation to simplify the manner by which citizens may have their names removed from an initiative petition, if they choose to do so.

Underscoring the problem of citizens signing without reading the petition is the experience of Catherine Johansen, a resident of northern Utah.

“I recently attended a town hall meeting where the (UEG) petition was displayed, taped down to the table, seemingly designed to discourage people from reading it,” she said.  “Knowing the content of the petition, because I have read it, I thought this tactic questionable if not unethical.  Even more disturbing to me were the many who were obligingly signing this petition without reading it, simply on the assurance from the people behind the tables that, ‘this is about an ethical legislature,’ which of course everyone is for, including me, but this seems like an unethical way to go about it.”

Sutherland Institute is of the opinion that a citizen who has read and discovered the perils included in the UEG initiative and subsequently wants to have his or her name removed should not have to endure a process which is much more difficult than the simple act of signing the petition.