45% of union households in Utah would leave unions, if …

workers724160A new survey of 394 union households in Utah shows that 45 percent would leave their unions if they could do so without losing their jobs or receiving any other sort of penalty, while nationally 33.4 percent of union households would opt out of their unions if given the chance. The survey was conducted by Google Consumer Surveys March 17 – June 7, 2013, with a margin of error of +/- 5.3 percent.

“This survey shows that many in Utah desire liberty from union coercion,” said Derek Monson, Director of Public Policy at Sutherland. “We hope that National Employee Freedom Week can help these working Utahns in their struggle to achieve freedom and prosperity for themselves and their families.”

Sutherland Institute announces the release of the survey as part of its participation with National Employee Freedom Week, a national campaign with 60 partner organizations in 35 states, including 11 national groups. National Employee Freedom Week (http://employeefreedomweek.com) is a first-of-its-kind national campaign to educate union members about their legal rights regarding union membership — and empower them to make the decision about union membership that’s best for them. National Employee Freedom Week (NEFW) runs from June 23 to 29.

For more information on National Employee Freedom Week, which is spearheaded by the Nevada Policy Research Institute and the Association of American Educators, please visit http://EmployeeFreedomWeek.com/ or contact David Buer with Sutherland Institute at 801-355-1272.

Lehi Roller Mills and bureaucracy

Lehi Roller Mills (Photo: David Jolley / Staplegunther, via Wikimedia Commons)

A great local business in northern Utah County, Lehi Roller Mills, has recently filed for bankruptcy protection. Hopefully the move will allow the company to get back on its feet and remain viable for the sake of the community, employees and owners.

It’s a mighty thin pancake that doesn’t have two sides. So, without knowing all the details, it’s impossible to say any of the players in this story is wholly in the right or in the wrong.

Having said that, some of what has contributed to the Roller Mills’ difficulty seems to be government overreaching.

Specifically, when the Roller Mills had trouble making payroll in July of 2012, the U.S. Department of Labor sent a letter to its suppliers and distributors threatening that they were in possible violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act for dealing with the Roller Mills.

Whatever the practices of a company, it cannot be helpful to their business survival to have other companies with whom they do business threatened by the government. Read more

Freedom to close businesses on Sunday is worth preserving

Living in a community bordering Highland, we see lots of signs for and against local Proposition 6, which would do away with the city’s Sunday closing. The anti-Proposition 6 campaign is in the right. People don’t need to shop on Sunday, essential services are still available, and communities ought to be able to protect widely shared standards in their policies. The Deseret News made a good case for Sunday-closing laws in April.

What is intriguing to me is the slogan the proponents of adding one more day of merchandising to the week have chosen. The “Yes on Proposition 6” signs include a one-word motto: “Freedom.”

This slogan is fatuous. Freedom from what? Community standards? What about employees who want the freedom to spend the day with their families? What about the freedom of young people to find jobs in the community that don’t require them to miss church services? What about the freedom of businesses that would be forced by national management to open on Sundays absent the law? What about the freedom of people who move to a city because of its standards to choose the environment in which they will live? Read more

No liberty is violated by Highland’s Sunday closures

Residents of the city of Highland are considering repealing a Sunday closure regulation. They alone will decide.

My interest in this debate is intellectual. My two cents is simply to remind Highland residents that there is no liberty interest at stake with your decision about Sunday closures, one way or another. In other words, no resident’s liberty is being violated by maintaining the Sunday closure regulation.

Argue for or against the regulation. Argue that the regulation is arbitrary and inconsistent. Argue in support of the regulation for religious or social reasons. Argue whatever you want … except … don’t argue that any individual’s liberty is being diminished because of the Sunday closure rule. It’s not. Read more

Dr. Moneylove or: How Al Gore Learned to Stop Capitalism and Love Government Connections

What happens when government begins to direct more and more of a country’s economy with the wealth it has taken from its people through taxation? China and Al Gore provide us examples. According to a Bloomberg report quoted by The Wall Street Journal,

“[T]he net worth of the 70 richest delegates in China’s National People’s Congress . . . rose to 565.8 billion yuan ($89.8 billion) in 2011, a gain of $11.5 billion from 2010.” That averages out to more than $1 billion per delegate, and we’re not even talking about the senior party leadership.

The excellent Wall Street Journal article continues.

All this is good to know as a reminder that China, so recently extolled as the very model of technocratic know-how, turns out to be a country heavily populated at the top by rent-seekers and kleptocrats. Should that be surprising? Not if you think that nothing else can come from the lucrative crossroads where politically directed capital and politically connected individuals meet.

Enter Al Gore. Read more

Utah government entities catalogue how they compete with the private sector

During yesterday’s interim meetings, the Legislature’s Political Subdivisions Interim Committee heard reports from representatives of higher education, K-12 public schools, counties, cities, and others about activities they participate in that potentially compete with the private sector and how they go about deciding to engage in such activities.

Those activities were fairly wide-ranging. For instance, universities compete sometimes with the private sector by allowing their catering services to do business off campus, often at a lower price than private caterers do it. Public schools compete with private beauty schools by providing cosmetology courses. Cities and counties compete with private businesses by building recreation centers and golf courses. Read more

Prospects for a humming future in the Beehive State

A recent publication by the Gallup organization is the latest to suggest a humming future for the Beehive State. In “Utah Poised to Be the Best U.S. State to Live In,” Dan Witters reports that the state leads all others with respect to 13 different categories of inquiry that address economic, workplace, community and personal choices.

As noted in the article, the selection of the 13 metrics was not based on any statistical model, but rather on their presumed relevance to future livability. The findings are based on the results of more than 530,000 interviews with U.S. adults conducted Jan. 2, 2011, through June 30, 2012, as a part of Gallup Daily tracking and the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index.

The specific categories include

  • Percentage of workers employed full time for an employer
  • Economic Confidence Index
  • Job Creation Index
  • Employee-supervisor relationship
  • Standard of living optimism
  • City optimism
  • Daily learning – of something new and interesting
  • Easy access to clean, safe water
  • Easy access to a safe place to exercise
  • Obesity
  • Smoking
  • Dentist visits
  • Future life evaluation

Read more

Big government, big business are 2 sides of the same coin

Conservatives are often accused of being the friend of Big Business because of their support of free markets. The irony of this argument, however, is that in reality it is Big Government – the child of most liberal policies – that is the best friend of big business.

The bigger government gets, the more it starts to intrude into peoples’ lives. When it comes to the economy, this means that it starts to put more burdensome, and often unnecessary, rules and regulations in place that make it hard to start, grow and run a business (e.g., excessive licensing fees and restrictions, unreasonable environmental regulations, health insurance mandates, special taxes on business, etc.).

As these intrusive policies multiply, what it creates is a scenario in which politically savvy businesses with enough money can navigate, and sometimes manipulate, the system to their advantage. Because small and medium-sized businesses by nature have fewer resources, they often cannot afford to play this political game, meaning that it is set up to favor big business with all of its lobbyists, political donations, and connections to people in power. As a result, this big government process almost always places the biggest burden on small business, giving big business the advantage.  Read more

Liberal economic policies are killing jobs

A conservative blog recently looked at data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on the “employment-population ratio” (EPR), which measures the percentage of America’s working age population that is actually employed – a good measure of the strength of the job creation and the economy. Looking at monthly data on this measure, the blogger reported that the 30 worst months for employment in the last 25 years have occurred under President Obama and, amazingly, all of these months occurred after the recent recession ended in June 2009.

Certainly, the employment-population ratio has decreased significantly in the past due to recessions, as the accompanying chart illustrates. After the dramatic inflation problems of the 1970s and recession in the early 1980s, in fact, the employment picture was even more dismal than it is today.

Read more

The reasonable road to a clean environment: Avoiding policy potholes

In addition to energy development, transportation policy is another illustration of the damage that radical environmental thinking does to people’s lives and the hope that conservative environmentalism brings for crafting reasonable solutions to environmental problems. And no area illustrates radical environmental transportation policy better than Portland, Ore.

Portland has a long history of, among other things, being the centerpiece for “environmentally friendly” urban growth and transportation policies – sometimes referred to as “smart growth.” In the 1970s, the Oregon State Legislature passed a law establishing stringent restrictions on urban growth. Portland city officials immediately jumped on board with the radical environmental thinking behind this “urban growth boundary” law and began canceling road construction and maintenance projects in favor of public transit projects like light rail (e.g.,  Utah’s TRAX system is a light-rail system).

What has decades of such “eco-friendly” thinking and policy produced for Portland residents? Recently, a local Oregon newspaper chronicled the pathetic state of Portland’s crumbling road system – a city assessment found that nearly half of neighborhood streets and more than a quarter of major roads are in “poor” or “very poor” condition – and the reasons behind its sorry state of affairs. Further, in the face of this dramatic need for road repairs, the Portland Transportation Bureau recently decided to put off any major road paving until “at least” 2017, and the city cut its road services budget (e.g., bridge monitoring, street cleaning, etc.) by $15 million. Read more