Stop sniping about website fiasco – focus on real health care issues

This post is a transcript of a 4-minute weekly radio commentary aired on several Utah radio stations.

Medical toolsI’ve watched with great interest how Obamacare seems to be crumbling right before our eyes. It has won every political hurdle it has faced from presidential elections to Supreme Court decisions. Who would have thought that the poor execution of a website would be its demise?

Of course, a true impression of the situation would have us admit that the website debacle has nothing to do with Obamacare as a policy – there is no relationship between the website problems and the veracity or goodness of Obamacare (unless we argue that anything the federal government attempts is doomed to failure – but that’s simply inaccurate).

Conservatives and other opponents of Obamacare make a huge mistake by not continuing to focus on its main defect. Obamacare will hurt freedom and Americans. It sounds reasonable, but it isn’t. It destroys any meaning of insurance and any balance between personal responsibility and true health insurance coverage. Conservatives need to argue that Obamacare is an entitlement, pure and simple. There is no concept of insurance underlying it. Forget insurance under Obamacare – insurance is dead. If anyone can be covered at any time with any pre-existing condition, the concept of insurance disappears forever.

This fatal flaw is exactly why Obamacare will lead quite naturally to single-payer government health coverage like the socialist systems in Canada and throughout Europe. If Obamacare is acceptable, there is no reason to avoid universal government health care. None.

As long as conservatives continue to miss the whole appeal of Obamacare, we will lose this fight.

As long as we nitpick and focus on website malfunctions we’ll continue to come across as petty and spiteful while proponents of Obamacare will look dedicated, caring and helpful – even if human as they execute the plan.

Conservatives need to recognize that a safety net for medical care must exist in a free society. We have to acknowledge that poor people get sick and they need medical care and that free market rhetoric fails to meet their needs. We have to argue forcefully and effectively that we “get it” – we get that defenders of freedom must provide an adequate health care safety net and that if we don’t create that safety net, progressives will, as they have with Obamacare.

Case in point: When we have thousands upon thousands of elderly people, in their last years of life, sitting in limbo between dignity and indignity – between the natural desire of family caregivers to keep their loved ones home versus the economic strains such loving sacrifice requires – conservatives need to innovate and discover private sector ways to improve the quality of life of the elderly. Government can’t do that – obviously it can’t.

As long as conservatives are swayed by libertarian and utilitarian impulses to neglect their fellow man in the name of principle, freedom will continue to disappear. But if conservatives can muster the moral and intellectual courage to meet all of the demands of a free society, we can reclaim freedom. Conservatives will value human dignity or we won’t. Either we’ll view life from conception to death as a miracle of God’s love or we will sink into a morass of human indignities – a morass populated with progressives who at least act like they care about other people.

Conservatives need to lead, not be their own worst enemies.

For Sutherland Institute, I’m Paul Mero. Thanks for listening.

Receive the Mero Moment each week directly to your iTunes by clicking here.

This entry was posted in Health Care and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Don Ruzicka

    Very well said, Paul! I have been in the health insurance business for 40 years and i can attest to the fact that the “evil” free market used to take care of far more people than the “brave new world” is taking care of now. First of all, the real “safety nets”, family, community, religious institutions and local government begin to diminish or disappear in their willingness or ability to be charitable when the government takes over charity through compulsion. This is true simply because there is less money and resources available for true charity. In addition, not too many years ago, those “greedy” insurance companies offered guaranteed issue health insurance to employer groups with as few as two employees. Individual coverage was available to almost everyone because insurance companies could offer insurance with waivers and/or rate-ups for particular medical conditions which allowed people with serious medical problems to get health insurance. Only the truly “uninsurable” were left to rely on “safety nets” and they were far more available than they are now. Isn’t it interesting and revealing that in spite of all the government mandates, overregulation and handouts, the number of uninsured Americans doesn’t seem to diminish significantly. We have about the same number of uninsured’s today, which, of course, ObamaCare will fix, as we did in 1995 just before HIPAA was enacted to fix that same problem 18 years ago. All these “fixes” are designed to patiently and carefully lead us to only one destination and that is Single Payer, Nationalized Health Care. Is anyone feeling like a frog in a very hot tub of water yet???

    • JeromefromLayton

      Some people still think it is a Hot Tub. Wait until they get introduced to the “Golden Rule” in which she who has the Gold Rules.

  • JeromefromLayton

    A long time ago in a land far away, just like the Star Wars intro: It was January 1992 and Rep. Vic Fazio was holding a town hall in Sacramento, CA on health care. He showed us three plans, A, B, and C or More of the same, a Government HMO, and Plan Canada (socialized medicine) moved south. Plan B turned out to be Hillary Care. All of them shared a common defect: Lack of a free market.

    That’s when I came up with “Plan J”, borrowed from the way things ran in Japan during the 1960s when I was there. Most providers there went to college for 4 to 6 years (like Engineers) and then entered a clinic. Because of the low overhead, most medical care is a cash for service proposition. If something serious happens, the Hospital is available and that is when the Insurance gets used. By the way, the “R” factor (genetic swapping between different kinds of bacteria) was discovered in Japan which lead to genetic engineering. If you know what you need, most drugs are non-prescription. Compare that to the USA and other countries where the “Fix is in” setting up a government enforced monopoly of service, information, and materials by the AMA, etc. The cost difference is staggering.

  • private health insurance, health insurance uk, health insurance quote

    You probably cause it to look really easy along with your speech even so discover this disorder for being basically something i always feel I may under no circumstances understand. It seems like too intricate and also large for me personally. I’m just impatient with your subsequent upload, I am going to try to have the embrace of the usb ports!