The order appeared to have the support of the full Court, since there were no noted dissents. The ruling can be interpreted as an indication that the Court wants to have further exploration in lower courts of the basic constitutional question of state power to limit marriage to a man and a woman. Had it refused the state’s request for delay, that would have left at least the impression that the Court was comfortable allowing same-sex marriages to go forward in the thirty-three states where they are still not permitted by state law.
The order, however, cannot be interpreted as a dependable indication of how the Court will rule on the issue when it finally decides to do so directly.
Click here to read more of this analysis.
(Lyle Denniston, Court stops Utah gay marriages, SCOTUSblog [Jan. 6, 2014, 10:34 AM], http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/01/court-stops-utah-gay-marriages/)
Share with your friends and family…