“I find it ironic that Ms. Williams was so quick to react to my opinion editorial with false accusations and inaccurate assumptions concerning my intent and feelings, but will not agree to engage in a public dialogue,” said Mero. “Given her accusations and stance, we feel she has a responsibility to step forward and defend those claims in a public-debate format that would help Utahns see if minorities and low-income families are actually helped or hurt by our current voucher law.”
While Ms. Williams’ letter claimed that minorities will be adversely affected by the current voucher law, Sutherland points to many credible sources which show that private schools across the nation, including Utah, are more integrated racially and/or socio-economically than public schools.
“Ms. Williams has thrown out some fairly substantial negative accusations regarding vouchers and public schools and their effect on minorities and low income families. What is interesting is that our experience shows the exact opposite of what Ms. Williams claims. What’s more is that the loudest supporters of vouchers are the poor and minority families in Utah, the very people Ms. Williams claims to represent,” Mero continued.
The Institute is hoping the Salt Lake branch of the NAACP will still act on the invitation for a televised public dialogue in which Ms. Williams could select a four-member team of her choosing, while Mero does the same. Sutherland believes this dialogue would provide a tremendous public service to the citizens of Utah as they prepare to go to the polls in November to decide on the school voucher issue.
Share with your friends and family…